Who has ever heard of an incel who is only purportedly unable to find a lover as the direct result of the criminal conduct of someone who is without question a psychopathy stalker and is purportedly only wanting a lover at the insistence of said psychopathy stalker?
And that is not the only thing that is completely and utterly absurd about this scenario. Who has ever heard of a victim of a psychopathy stalker who is not thoroughly outraged? And what nonsense it is for a psychopathy stalker to use their victim's outrage to rationalize the continued harassment, privacy invasion, and rights infringements of their victim. It is completely and utterly absurd.
And how absurd is it that a victim of a psychopathy stalker should be condemned for his behaviour when all legal recourse and any other recourse otherwise available to him is denied him as a direct result of the criminal conduct of said psychopathy stalker?
The word incel is a contraction of the words involuntary and celibate. A person would only be an incel if that person were both wanting a lover and unable to find a lover despite his or her best efforts. A person who is neither wanting a lover nor making an effort to find a lover cannot by definition be an incel.
The salient points in case you missed them are:
1. A person is only an incel if he or she is wanting a lover and despite his or her efforts unable to find one.
2. A person would only be thought, believed, or known to be an incel if such person were complaining of being unable to find a lover or otherwise making an issue of being unable to find a lover.
3. A person thought, believed, or known to be an incel despite not complaining of being unable to find a lover, or otherwise making an issue of being unable to find a lover, can only be widely thought, believed, or known to be an incel as a result of the actions of a third party. i.e. The person is being maligned or slandered.
And I'm not ranting anymore.
I do not have to tolerate being the victim of a crime and I refuse to be a victim of a crime. My pursuing justice does not prove my psychopathy stalker correct in any way if all they are able to take issue with is my not being an idiot. William David Duke 3 years ago
I have every right to believe myself right, when I'm wrong, but most especially when I am actually correct. And it is most aggravating and frustrating to be forced to tolerate such abuses, intrusions, and interference without any recourse whatsoever because I'm being ruled against solely on the basis that I believe myself right and not on the basis of whether I actually am right.
William David Duke 3 years ago
No one is saying that females have no right to not want me. What I am saying is that they have no right to insist that I want them, and that they certainly have no right to refuse to accept that I do not. William David Duke 3 years ago
I think insisting that I am wanting you could be called harassment.
I think refusing to accept that I'm not wanting you could be called delusional disorder - erotomanic type.
I think invading my privacy could be called criminal harassment.
I think dismissing me as mentally ill could be called discrimination.
I think telling people that I'm mentally ill, a predator, and an incel could be called slander.
I think that denying me recourse could be called an infringement of my rights.
Far be it for me to play the role of someone living in the real world, but I think my responses to all of that could be called pissed off. William David Duke 3 years ago
Rant Tags
Get Social and Share