I know! Everything proves them correct. When they're telling lies and making outlandish claims and allegations they're correct. When their outlandish claims and allegations are proven false they are also proven correct. It's a no win situation when you're the victim of a psychopathy stalker who either works for the Sarnia Police or has friends or relatives working for the Sarnia Police.
Fortunately there are courts and I have those as my last resort. In court being proven a liar doesn't prove you correct. In court being proven a liar only proves you a liar.
The last laugh is on me because the asexual man will "never know the touch of a woman". I just have two questions: 1) Can I join in the laughter; and, 2) Will I be punished for laughing loudest and laughing best?
The way I see it it's going to work like this:
You're going to be called upon to substantiate your outrageous claims and allegations. Once you have failed in that endeavour you will be compelled to justify your invasion of my privacy, your infringement of my rights and the discrimination. Which you will also fail to do.
I figure you're going to put a lot of emphasis on mental illness just as you have in the past. You will probably use my rants against me just as you have in the past. The Crown, in the case of a prosecution, will likely pursue a psychiatric assessment which I will argue against. The matter will proceed to trial if my habeas corpus application fails.
At trial, if it reaches that point, my defence will be that I was a victim of criminal harassment, willful blindness, and discrimination; essentially that I was entrapped by a justice system keen on seeing the victim punished and the perpetrator rewarded.
The Crown I anticipate will counter this defence with my history of mental illness. I will counter that by pointing out that I haven't a history of mental illness but a history of being dismissed arbitrarily as mentally ill. In essence that I have only a history of being discriminated against and that this history of discrimination goes back only as far as the duration of the crime perpetrated against me. I will stress that I was at all times arbitrarily dismissed as delusional and/or hallucinating without any sort of investigation.
As for my rants being used against me, I will again point to the discrimination and stress the fact that I had been denied legal recourse. In support of this I will offer evidence of the arbitrary dismissals, proof of some of the outlandish claims that I have attempted to fight with limited success, and the incredibly asine and absurd arguments and logic offered i defence of and accepted by the various oversight bodies. This I will offer as proof that I am indeed being maligned and criminally harassed for were this not the case I would have been treated fairly by these oversight bodies and ostensibly none of those comlaints would have need been made.
It's going to be interesting. So here's another rant to add to your collection, Mr./Ms. Stalker.
William David DukeMiscellaneous November 01, 2023 at 1:07 pm
00
There are a lot of fucking typos in the above so you're going to have to use your superior intellect to discern from context what is meant. i.e. fairly obviously should have been unfairly, asine obviously should have been asinine. You get the gist.
Take it away, genius.
p.s. I hate this keyboard. I make more typos with this keyboard than other. :(
p.s.s. Can you believe how stupid a lot of people are? Did you know that there are people who believe me to be big brother? How absurd, right? Not only is there no evidence to support that but I am hardly in a position to be big brother even if I wanted to be. Apparently some moron contrived the notion that if he perpetrates crimes against me and I seek justice I am proving myself to be big brother. People in radio I'm thoroughly convinced live on another planet. William David Duke 3 years ago
Rant Tags
Get Social and Share